ext_2731 ([identity profile] antennapedia.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] beccaelizabeth 2006-08-05 05:54 pm (UTC)

When I'm in reader mode, I kinda don't like the footnoting approach. References are a game. If I get them, great! My appreciation of the writing is enhanced. If I don't get them, no problem; the writing can still stand on its own. (Or it should.) If the writer feels he must credit every single little Shakespearean tag, I'd prefer all that at the end. No interruptions to the story itself.[1]

Extensive borrowings need to be noted in front matter, like for episode re-tellings. But the odd reference? Nope. And I kinda don't want to know about the historical research, either. Just give me the damn story! Oh, I am a cranky reader this morning.

[1] Terry Pratchett footnoting is another art form altogether.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org