Date: 2007-02-17 04:05 pm (UTC)
*nods*

But then Torchwood simply reads as an anti-monarchist argument, which isn't a substantially different reading....

Then again, even to this clueless American, this seems like an oversimplified reading of British constitutional politics. I know there are supposed limits to the Sovereign's authority. She's not allowed in the House of Commons, for one, and -- ahem -- can be tried and executed for treason by Parliament.

If it's government-mandated it's legal.

Mu understanding is there's a distinction between the Crown and her Government. Elizabeth is Head of State and rules Britain (and Canada and Australia and....); Blair/Harriet Jones/Whoever is Head of Government and runs the government, which means that Torchwood isn't government-mandated, but state-mandated.

Indeed, it can't be government-mandated; Harriet Jones wasn't even supposed to know that it existed, if you remember.

It may be a distinction without a difference, but then, above about Torchwood simply reading as anti-monarchist.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

beccaelizabeth: my Watcher tattoo in blue, plus Be in red Buffy style font (Default)
beccaelizabeth

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 3 45 67
891011 12 13 14
1516 17 18192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 01:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios