Crime Traveller: Very bad.
Feb. 3rd, 2006 02:41 pmfinished watching 'Crime Traveller'
boring, pointless, depressing, annoying, and frequently implausible in ways nothing to do with their time travel gimmick. Plus the time travel gimmick itself isn't internally consistent.
They set up a story where you can't change time, but you can interact with it. You can be history but you can't change history. Predestination in a little loop.
What the hell was the point?
and then the thing with the vanishing writing without the bits of paper themselves vanishing, or the vanishing large physical changes (wounds) without the vanishing small physical changes (memories).
It just doesn't *work*
Doctor Who style time travel might be completely bizarre and untidy, but you can make a million stories with it.
Crime Traveller didn't manage 8 without repeating the basics over and over and over. I mean theres only so many times you can frame yourself for a crime, you know?
The writers just set themselves up with a premise that goes nowhere.
A machine that let you *view* the past, say as an incorporeal entity, without being able to interact with it physically, would actually have had more stories in it, methinks.
One where its all like the end of the Bill & Ted movies where you go back and do the things that you were affected by the first time through ... B&T used it for a joke, and because plot wasn't really their strong point, and it only sort of worked then. Using it as the centre of the plot? Bad.
/rant
I could start a whole other rant about how amazingly un-feminist it is, but that would be loud and annoying.
I'm just going to go sell the DVDs on Amazon now.
boring, pointless, depressing, annoying, and frequently implausible in ways nothing to do with their time travel gimmick. Plus the time travel gimmick itself isn't internally consistent.
They set up a story where you can't change time, but you can interact with it. You can be history but you can't change history. Predestination in a little loop.
What the hell was the point?
and then the thing with the vanishing writing without the bits of paper themselves vanishing, or the vanishing large physical changes (wounds) without the vanishing small physical changes (memories).
It just doesn't *work*
Doctor Who style time travel might be completely bizarre and untidy, but you can make a million stories with it.
Crime Traveller didn't manage 8 without repeating the basics over and over and over. I mean theres only so many times you can frame yourself for a crime, you know?
The writers just set themselves up with a premise that goes nowhere.
A machine that let you *view* the past, say as an incorporeal entity, without being able to interact with it physically, would actually have had more stories in it, methinks.
One where its all like the end of the Bill & Ted movies where you go back and do the things that you were affected by the first time through ... B&T used it for a joke, and because plot wasn't really their strong point, and it only sort of worked then. Using it as the centre of the plot? Bad.
/rant
I could start a whole other rant about how amazingly un-feminist it is, but that would be loud and annoying.
I'm just going to go sell the DVDs on Amazon now.