Cultural appropriation
big argue
( Read more... )also, there is a big assumption of 'dominant' culture
sociology of media last week, postmodern say no big blobby dominant culture (er, in the diagram with circles and arrows, there was just arrows), because everyone makes their own from parts
pastiche, bricolage, taking bits from all over and remaking them
familiar?
typical postmodern texts = cultural appropriation?
( Read more... )My *actual* point is, there are a bazillion different cultures.
Tiny, tiny subcultures with a couple dozen people in it, massive class differences, difference between US and UK, all kinds of differences.
( Read more... )So while I get that there are power issues, history issues, all kinds of shallow reading / bad writing issues involved
I absolutely do not get people saying to stick with 'your own culture', because when you get right down to it each reader/writer is an individual within several different cultures, defined in lots of different ways, physical difference, history, experience, shared texts
and its amazing we ever communicate at all, there is so little overlap.
Might as well write about all kinds of people.
Specially if it means reading/learning about them first.
( Read more... )I still have a problem with the whole 'culture' concept. My brain works more in units of one person. (To type a sweeping generalisation). Pouring them all in together and calling it 'a' culture makes no sense to me. I mean two people with all their big 'culture' categories the same can read a text in radically different ways, sometimes several ways at once. So what does 'a culture' mean anyway? Big collection of many differences, is what.
Meh. Shall post this even though I think I say it all wrong.