renaissance people
Mar. 4th, 2009 05:09 pmHave successfully done both laundry and reading.
I borrowed Sir Philip Sidney, Courtier Poet by Katherine Duncan-Jones. Teacher recommended.
So far I have read the first chapter and skimmed the second, and so far I have found two things that contradict at least in part what we were told out loud in class.
The first chapter is interesting because it's all about women. ( Read more... )
I don't understand the guy who was complaining about how we don't need all this history to understand the poems. The more you read about what was happening at the time, families that were mostly young girls who kept dying as children, the only male heir being a nephew or cousin or someone who married in, people being widowed and remarrying so much, disease leaving permanent and very visible scars, family quarrels about who dumped who when that turn into massive political weights that shove history around, the more you realise all this is woven in to the poetry like the long strong threads. Sure, the pretty patterns are words on a page, we can see those, but it's the stuff holding it all together that tells us why it mattered. How much more threatening an adulterous passion when large units of politics and economy are bound up in the people involved? And how much of a barrier would marriage truly seem when death was so present? It all adds depth.
It's quite frustrating being both interested and dozing off over the book.
But hey, sink unblocked, cleaner did the magic, laundry got done, reading got done, Wednesday jobs achieved. I can fall asleep again if I wants to.
... which really yes.
I borrowed Sir Philip Sidney, Courtier Poet by Katherine Duncan-Jones. Teacher recommended.
So far I have read the first chapter and skimmed the second, and so far I have found two things that contradict at least in part what we were told out loud in class.
The first chapter is interesting because it's all about women. ( Read more... )
I don't understand the guy who was complaining about how we don't need all this history to understand the poems. The more you read about what was happening at the time, families that were mostly young girls who kept dying as children, the only male heir being a nephew or cousin or someone who married in, people being widowed and remarrying so much, disease leaving permanent and very visible scars, family quarrels about who dumped who when that turn into massive political weights that shove history around, the more you realise all this is woven in to the poetry like the long strong threads. Sure, the pretty patterns are words on a page, we can see those, but it's the stuff holding it all together that tells us why it mattered. How much more threatening an adulterous passion when large units of politics and economy are bound up in the people involved? And how much of a barrier would marriage truly seem when death was so present? It all adds depth.
It's quite frustrating being both interested and dozing off over the book.
But hey, sink unblocked, cleaner did the magic, laundry got done, reading got done, Wednesday jobs achieved. I can fall asleep again if I wants to.
... which really yes.