I have been thinking, and since it is an argue that got me thinking I should probably only talk about it sideways, but hey, I'll live dangerously.
The question is, why is Oz blue raspberry popsicles? Because someone copied that image from someone else, or because of some fundamental quality of Oz-ness?
( Read more... )Blue raspberry popsicles seem to accurately reflect an aspect of fundamental Oz-ness, and as such can be reached from knowledge of Oz without knowledge of other stories that have noted this fact.
Sometimes I'll find a new story that covers the exact same image as one I'm currently working on. I don't assume someone read my mind. If it is possible, it would still be unlikely. I assume that we are both working through the same characters, who draw on the same symbols, and therefore remind us of the same things. I think mostly stories work that way.
And even if a particular image sparks another story, I would not find that a bad thing. Lifting a plot or an original character, yeah, bad thing, probably. Tho doing the same basic plot in a different way can come up with interesting new art, like all the variations on Greek myth.
The only bad kind of copying is taking big sections of text and claiming them as your own. The other is the great big stewpot of images we call culture, or subculture, or fandom. We all draw on it, we all pour stuff back in, and this is how art happens.