So a while back I wrote to the BBC about subtitling. I was probably unclear, but I asked "do you get a script to work from, or do you just listen, or run it through a machine or something?" and I was asking about Torchwood. The reply I got was:
Subtitles are produced differently for live and for pre-recorded programmes. For live programmes, like the news, the BBC uses a team of subtitlers and stenographers. Any material which we can obtain in advance, such as written news links or news reports on VHS tape, is used to prepare subtitles. These are then sent out live as the programme goes out on air.
Genuinely live programmes/reports, or those which are completed very close to transmission and for which no material is available beforehand, are mainly produced by a technique known as broadcast stenography or stenocaptioning. Stenography is a type of machine-written shorthand based on phonetics, as used in courtrooms. BBC stenocaptioners employ the same technique, with the difference that the shorthand outline is translated by computer and transmitted instantly onto air. We still subtitle most of our live output using stenographers, but as stenographers are in short supply, in the last few years we have begun to use speech recognition technology to expand the areas we can cover with live subtitling. We now use speech recognition to live subtitle most sporting events. A speech subtitler listens to the commentary and "respeaks" it into software which recognises the speech and translates it into subtitles.
Pre-recorded programmes can be subtitled days or weeks in advance, depending on when the programme is delivered. For pre-recorded
programmes, the subtitles are stored on a computer file which is sent to the transmission area and played out with the programme.
Which is interesting, but... er, where did they answer the question? I mean, it says they're on a computer file to be sent out, but it doesn't says if they're working from a script to put them in. They say they get all the news stuff they can in advance, so it seems likely, but there's the if they can bit, which were part of what I was asking.
BBC subtitles remain superior to other channels. Channel 4 is still giving me garbage and missed lines, and FilmFour+1 is always out of synch rather badly. Is all very well their site saying it is a reception problem but it do remain a problem.
The existence of subtitles remains cool.
Subtitles are produced differently for live and for pre-recorded programmes. For live programmes, like the news, the BBC uses a team of subtitlers and stenographers. Any material which we can obtain in advance, such as written news links or news reports on VHS tape, is used to prepare subtitles. These are then sent out live as the programme goes out on air.
Genuinely live programmes/reports, or those which are completed very close to transmission and for which no material is available beforehand, are mainly produced by a technique known as broadcast stenography or stenocaptioning. Stenography is a type of machine-written shorthand based on phonetics, as used in courtrooms. BBC stenocaptioners employ the same technique, with the difference that the shorthand outline is translated by computer and transmitted instantly onto air. We still subtitle most of our live output using stenographers, but as stenographers are in short supply, in the last few years we have begun to use speech recognition technology to expand the areas we can cover with live subtitling. We now use speech recognition to live subtitle most sporting events. A speech subtitler listens to the commentary and "respeaks" it into software which recognises the speech and translates it into subtitles.
Pre-recorded programmes can be subtitled days or weeks in advance, depending on when the programme is delivered. For pre-recorded
programmes, the subtitles are stored on a computer file which is sent to the transmission area and played out with the programme.
Which is interesting, but... er, where did they answer the question? I mean, it says they're on a computer file to be sent out, but it doesn't says if they're working from a script to put them in. They say they get all the news stuff they can in advance, so it seems likely, but there's the if they can bit, which were part of what I was asking.
BBC subtitles remain superior to other channels. Channel 4 is still giving me garbage and missed lines, and FilmFour+1 is always out of synch rather badly. Is all very well their site saying it is a reception problem but it do remain a problem.
The existence of subtitles remains cool.